Name a fund. The engine locates the filings and the quarterly commentary, runs the ten progressions from the book, and returns a citation-anchored due diligence report — in minutes, not weekends. And with Portfolio Lens, add several funds at once and see what the whole sleeve actually owns.
Type the fund's name or ticker — any registered vehicle. The engine identifies the vehicle type from its filing pattern and loads the matching chapter's ten progressions. Private drawdown funds work too: upload the PPM, LPA, or LP letters instead.
It pulls the latest 10-Q or 10-K, the manager's quarterly commentary, and any tender filings, then interrogates them one progression at a time. You watch each section get filed as it completes.
An executive summary, ten cited sections, flagged items, and a list of follow-up questions for the manager. Every figure is sourced to the specific filing and section — where the documents are silent, the report says so instead of guessing.
This is what comes out: a plain-English briefing an advisor can use to explain the fund, followed by short summaries under each of the ten progressions — every figure from the fund's own filings, flags included.
Fund-level diligence answers "is this fund sound?" Portfolio Lens answers the harder question: what does the whole sleeve actually own? Switch to Lens mode, add two to five funds with their weights, and the engine profiles each from its latest filings, then writes three sections no fact sheet will give you:
The combined portfolio by what it really is — middle-market credit, PE and co-investments, secondaries, real assets — plus the floating-rate share and the U.S. concentration. It ends in one plain sentence: what the client actually owns.
How the funds move together economically — including why correlations measured on appraisal-based NAVs look deceptively calm, where funds lending in the same market share the same borrowers, and what happens when every fund's quarterly exit door gets crowded in the same quarter.
What the sleeve lacks — equity-style private markets, secondaries, real assets, fixed-rate duration, vintage diversification — framed as observations and questions, never recommendations. The judgment stays with the advisor.
Drawdown funds leave no public trail — the diligence lives in the PPM and the LPA. Upload those documents and the engine runs a dedicated set of progressions: waterfall and clawback mechanics, track record attribution, fee offsets against ILPA standards, key person terms, and a final section listing what the documents don't disclose, framed as data requests for the manager.
Uploaded documents are processed in your own Claude session solely to generate your report — never searched against the web, and never stored on this site. You represent that you have the right to submit them.